‘Horrific, terrible Hamas supporters’ protest outside the DNC

The Democratic National Convention (DNC) in Chicago has become a battleground, with protests erupting outside the venue. Filmmaker Ami Horowitz sheds light on the chaotic atmosphere, highlighting the stark divide within the Democratic Party and the troubling support for extremist groups.

Key Takeaways

• Protests outside the DNC are marked by violence and anti-Semitism.
• A significant divide exists within the Democratic Party regarding support for Israel.
• The presence of pro-Israeli activists has led to counter-protests, raising safety concerns.
• The Democratic leadership faces criticism for their handling of internal dissent.

The Atmosphere Outside the DNC

The protests outside the DNC are anything but peaceful. Police presence has surged as tensions escalate between pro-Israeli activists and those supporting Hamas. Horowitz describes the scene as chaotic, with a palpable sense of hostility.

He notes, “There’s no good vibes, there’s no joy among these people. These are horrific, terrible, Hamas terrorist-supporting people.” This sentiment underscores the gravity of the situation, as the protests reflect deeper ideological rifts within the party.

The Divide Within the Democratic Party

Horowitz emphasizes that the protesters are not just expressing dissent; they are fundamentally opposed to the Democratic Party itself. He states, “These are not people who are going to get Kamala’s support, despite she is kowtowing to them.” This highlights a critical issue: the disconnect between party leadership and its more radical factions.

• Internal Meetings in Secret: Jewish groups within the DNC are reportedly holding meetings in secret due to fears of violence from the hard left. This secrecy indicates a troubling environment where open dialogue is stifled by fear.
• Contrasting Responses: In contrast to the DNC, the Republican National Convention (RNC) has seen Jewish voices openly advocating for the return of hostages, showcasing a stark difference in how each party engages with its constituents.

Criticism of Democratic Leadership

Horowitz criticizes the Democratic leadership for their handling of the situation. He points out that figures like Josh Shapiro, the popular governor of Pennsylvania, are being overlooked in favor of more radical candidates. This decision could have significant implications for the upcoming elections.

• Potential Consequences: If the Democrats lose the election, Horowitz suggests that the choice to sideline moderate voices like Shapiro could be a pivotal factor. He states, “If she loses, we can go back and point that and say that might have been the reason why she ended up losing.”

The State of Political Violence

The conversation shifts to the broader issue of political violence in the U.S. Horowitz notes that the current environment has forced political figures like Donald Trump to appear behind bulletproof glass, a stark contrast to the safety enjoyed by Democratic leaders.

• Historical Context: He references past incidents of violence, including the shooting of Congressman Steve Scalise and the assassination attempt on Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh, to illustrate a pattern of violence associated with the hard left.
• A Call for Reflection: Horowitz urges a reflection on the state of political discourse, suggesting that the left has increasingly resorted to violence as a means of pushing their agenda.

Conclusion

The protests outside the DNC serve as a microcosm of the larger ideological battles within the Democratic Party. As tensions rise and divisions deepen, the implications for the upcoming elections become increasingly significant. The question remains: can the Democratic leadership navigate these turbulent waters, or will the internal strife lead to their downfall?